League of Women Voters of Michigan
© LWVMI Education Fund 2008
Court
of Appeals Districts by County |
|||||
|
FIRST
DISTRICT
|
FOURTH DISTRICT (CONTINUED) | ||||
| Calhoun | Hillsdale | Lenawee | Cheboygan | Chippewa | Clare |
| Monroe | Wayne | Clinton | Crawford | Delta | |
| Dickinson | Emmet | Gladwin | |||
|
SECOND
DISTRICT
|
Gogebic | Grand Traverse | Gratiot | ||
| Genesee | Macomb | Oakland | Houghton | Huron | Ingham |
| Shiawassee | Iosco | Iron | Isabella | ||
| Kalkaska | Keweenaw | Lake | |||
|
THIRD
DISTRICT
|
Lapeer | Leelanau | Livingston | ||
| Allegan | Barry | Berrien | Luce | Mackinac | Manistee |
| Branch | Cass | Eaton | Marquette | Mason | Mecosta |
| Ionia | Jackson | Kalamazoo | Menominee | Midland | Missaukee |
| Kent | Muskegon | Newaygo | Montcalm | Montmorency | Oceana |
| Ottawa | St. Joseph | Van Buren | Ogemaw | Ontonagon | Osceola |
| Washtenaw | Oscoda | Otsego | Presque Isle | ||
| Roscommon | Saginaw | Sanilac | |||
|
FOURTH
DISTRICT
|
Schoolcraft | St. Clair | Tuscola | ||
| Alcona | Alger | Alpena | Wexford | ||
| Antrim | Arenac | Baraga | |||
| Bay | Benzie | Charlevoix | |||
Court of Appeals
Candidates were asked to
summarize their backgrounds in 75 words and were allotted 75 words to answer
each question. If the candidate did not
reply by the required date for publication, the words “Did not respond in time
for publication” appear under the candidate’s name.
Please summarize your
background. (75 words)
1. What
criteria will you use to disqualify yourself in cases where there is a real or
perceived conflict of interest? (75
words)
2. What do you
perceive as the greatest obstacles to justice, if any? (75 words)
3. What is
your vision for the future of our judicial system? What changes would you advocate and why? (75 words)
First District Judge of the Court of
Appeals – 6 Year Term – Vote for Three (3)
Karen Fort Hood Did
not respond in time for publication.
Chris Murray
Christopher Murray is Chief Judge Pro Tem of the
Court of Appeals, and was previously a Wayne Circuit Court judge. Judge Murray is on the board of directors for
several bar associations, and is an adjunct professor at the University of Detroit Mercy School of Law, and a member of the Model
Civil Jury Instruction Committee. Judge
Murray earned his JD at the University of Detroit School of
Law, and his BA from
1. Like all
2. Although
the question is somewhat ambiguous, if access to the justice system is the
concern, I believe that greatest obstacle is the cost of litigating cases
through the court system. Those who are
indigent can proceed (with court approval) without paying costs and fees, but
for those low to middle income people who can afford (but barely) to institute
litigation, the costs are staggering. I
saw this far too often in family law cases.
3. We have an
excellent judicial system in
Michael J. Talbot Did not respond in time for publication.
Second District Judge of the Court of
Appeals – 6 Year Term – Vote for Three (3)
Mark J. Cavanagh Did not respond in time for publication
E. Thomas Fitzgerald Did not respond in time for publication
Henry William Saad Did not respond in time for publication
Second District Judge of the Court of
Appeals – Partial Term Ending 01/01/2013 – Vote for One (1)
Elizabeth L. Gleicher Did not respond in time for publication
Third District Judge of the Court of
Appeals – 6 Year Term – Vote for Two (2)
Richard A. Bandstra Chose not to
reply.
Jane E. Markey Did not respond in time for publication
Third District Judge of the Court of
Appeals – Partial Term ending 01/01/2013 – Vote for One (1)
Jane M. Beckering Did not
respond in time for publication
Fourth District Judge of the Court of
Appeals – 6 Year Term – Vote for Two (2)
Patrick Murphy Meter Did not
respond in time for publication
Fourth District Judge of the Court of
Appeals – 6 Year Term – Vote for One (1)
Michael J. Kelly
Education: MSU/DCL, J.D.
1. The
criteria I would use to disqualify myself from a case is
set forth in the Michigan Court Rules, MCR 2.003 as well as Canon 2 of the
Michigan Code of Judicial Conduct. I
would always err on the side of disqualification because impartiality is the
cornerstone of judicial conduct and even a perceived conflict of interest can
quickly spoil the public’s confidence in the justice system.
2. The
greatest obstacles to justice in my view are the time and expense of
litigation. Few people would dispute
that cases take far too long to be resolved and the cost can break ordinary
people. The other obstacle is political
pressure affecting judicial decisions. The judiciary is the third branch of
government and must be independent and free from any political influence.
3. Although I
believe the jury system is the greatest part of our justice system I see a
future with more private alternative dispute resolution methods such as
arbitration and facilitation. While
these may be fine for large corporations, I do not feel they should be forced
on those who do not want to waive the right to a jury trial or cannot afford
these very expensive private arbitrations or facilitations.
Paula Manderfield
Born and raised in the UP,
I’m the 8th of 12 kids. I
earned my associates degree in Nursing(MTU) &
later my BSN(MSU). I worked my way through law school(Cooley)
as a nurse. I was in private practice for 10 yrs, and then ran for District
Judge which I was for 8 years before running for Circuit Judge. Attorney for 26 years. Married with 4 children. My husband is on faculty at MSU in turfgrass.
1. I would disqualify myself if I have
bias or prejudice toward a party; also when I or my family might have a
financial interest in the outcome. Also
when there is the appearance of a conflict and another judge is available I would
do so. There is a specific court rule that applies to disqualifications and
states the reasons a judge must disqualified such as being related to a party.
2. It is increasingly difficult for the
average person to be able to afford to come to court to litigate a claim or to
defend criminal charges. It is also very difficult for an injured person to
recover damages in
3. Continued use and expansion of
Alternative Dispute Resolutions such as Facilitative Mediation. This saves
money and time for all parties.